Armor Screen Corp. v. Storm Catcher, Inc. » The Florida E-Discovery Case Law Database » Levin College of Law » University of Florida

Armor Screen Corp. v. Storm Catcher, Inc.

Armor Screen Corp. v. Storm Catcher, Inc.

Case Date: 10/29/2008
Citation: Armor Screen Corp. v. Storm Catcher, Inc., Case No. 07-81091-Civ-Ryskamp/Vitunac, 2008 WL 4753358 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2008)
Court Type: Federal District
Court: Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Judge: Federal Magistrate Judge: Ann E. Vitunac
Rule(s): Rule 26; Rule 34
Issues:

Plaintiff moved to compel Defendants to schedule depositions, provide certain documents in hard copy format, and to supplement discovery responses.

Resolution:

The Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to compel in part and denied it in part. The Court ordered Plaintiff and Defendant to schedule depositions, and held Defendant’s production of electronic files in a .max format with an inexpensive program to view the files  was sufficient. Additionally, the Court ordered Defendant to supplement the discovery responses at issue.

Relevant Documents:

Motion to Compel (Doc. 93) 

Response in Opposition to Motion to Compel (Doc. 124)

Order on Motion to Compel (Doc. 144) 

E-Discovery Issues: Motion to Compel
E-discovery Tags: Communication/Cooperation, Form of Production, Preservation and Collection, Vendor
E-discovery subjects: Software, Spreadsheets

Published: March 2nd, 2018

Category: Uncategorized


Deprecated: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /h/cnswww-ediscovery.law/ediscovery.law.ufl.edu/htdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5516

Comments are closed.