Cableview Commc’ns of Jacksonville, Inc. v. Time Warner Cable Se., LLC
Cableview Commc’ns of Jacksonville, Inc. v. Time Warner Cable Se., LLC
Case Date: | 05/04/2015 |
Citation: | Cableview Commc'ns of Jacksonville, Inc. v. Time Warner Cable Se., LLC, Case No. 3:13-cv-306-J-34JRK, 2015 WL 12838175 (M.D. Fla. May 4, 2015) |
Court Type: | Federal District |
Court: | Middle District of Florida (M.D. Fla.) |
Judge: | Federal Magistrate Judge: James R. Klindt |
Rule(s): | Rule 26; Rule 34; Rule 37 |
Issues: | Plaintiff filed a motion to compel, seeking documents demonstrating Defendant’s financial status and Defendant’s document retention policies. |
Resolution: | The Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to compel with respect to documents demonstrating Defendant’s financial status. Although Plaintiff claimed discovery of the documents would be related to its punitive damages claim, Plaintiff needed to show a reasonable basis for punitive damages before it was entitled to discovery, and Plaintiff failed to do so as there was not sufficient evidence that Defendant intentionally and unjustifiable interfered with its business. Moreover, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to compel with respect to Defendant’s document retention policies, as Defendant later produced the alleged spoliated documents and explained why they were initially missing. |
Relevant Documents: | Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Doc. 87) Response in Opposition to Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Doc. 96) Order on Motion to Compel (Doc. 114)
|
E-Discovery Issues: | Motion to Compel |
E-discovery Tags: | Data Retention, Preservation and Collection, Privilege, Records Retention Policies, Relevancy, Sanctions, Spoliation, Work Product |
E-discovery subjects: | Email, Servers |
Deprecated: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /h/cnswww-ediscovery.law/ediscovery.law.ufl.edu/htdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5516