Costa v. Metro. Life Ins. Co. » The Florida E-Discovery Case Law Database » Levin College of Law » University of Florida

Costa v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

Costa v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

Case Date: 04/05/2018
Citation: Costa v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., Case No: 6:17-cv-714-Orl-40TBS, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58110 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 5, 2018)
Court Type: Federal District
Court: Middle District of Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Judge: Federal Magistrate Judge: Thomas B. Smith
Rule(s): Rule 26; Rule 45
Issues:

Defendant moved to compel production of documents from a non-party.  Non-party objected to the subpoenaed documents on grounds that the documents were protected by attorney-client privilege and work product privilege, and the production of the documents would be unduly burdensome.

Resolution:

The Court denied Defendant’s motion to compel. The Court found no merit in Defendant’s attorney-client and work product objections, but found that the motion to compel was overbroad and imposed an undue burden on non-party Beachside Legal Services.

Relevant Documents:

Defendant’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Doc. 55) 

Non-Party’s Objection and Response to Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Doc. 59) 

Motion to Overrule Non-Parties’ Objections to Compel Production (Doc. 60) 

Non-Party’s Response to Motion to Overrule Non-Parties’ Objection to Motion to Compel (Doc. 61) 

Order on Motion to Compel (Doc. 62) 

E-Discovery Issues: Motion to Compel
E-discovery Tags: Attorney-Client, Non-Party Discovery, Possession or Control, Privilege, Proportionality, Relevancy, Work Product

Published: April 9th, 2018

Category: Uncategorized


Deprecated: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /h/cnswww-ediscovery.law/ediscovery.law.ufl.edu/htdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5411

Comments are closed.