Dolan-Heitlinger v. Nat’l Credit Union Admin. » The Florida E-Discovery Case Law Database » Levin College of Law » University of Florida

Dolan-Heitlinger v. Nat’l Credit Union Admin.

Dolan-Heitlinger v. Nat’l Credit Union Admin.

Case Date: 03/16/2010
Citation: Dolan-Heitlinger v. Nat'l Credit Union Admin., No. 09–10095–CIV, 2010 WL 989236 (S.D. Fla. March 16, 2010)
Court Type: Federal District
Court: Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Judge: Federal Magistrate Judge: Andrea M. Simonton
Rule(s): Rule 26(a)
Issues:

Plaintiff claimed a breach of employment contract and a breach of deferred compensation contract. Plaintiff filed multiple motions to compel, seeking documents and better answers to its interrogatories.

Resolution:

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Comply with sections of the State Court’s Order, and Motion to Compel Defendant to Provide a Better Answer to Interrogatories granted in part.

Relevant Documents:

Motion to Compel (Doc. 15)

Motion to Compel (Doc. 16)

Motion to Compel (Doc. 17) 

Response in Opposition to Motion to Compel (Doc. 24)

Response in Opposition to Motion to Compel (Doc. 25) 

Order (Doc. 32) 

E-Discovery Issues: Motion to Compel
E-discovery Tags: Costs, Privilege, Work Product

Published: November 26th, 2017

Category: Uncategorized


Deprecated: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /h/cnswww-ediscovery.law/ediscovery.law.ufl.edu/htdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5411

Comments are closed.