Dolan-Heitlinger v. Nat’l Credit Union Admin.
Dolan-Heitlinger v. Nat’l Credit Union Admin.
| Case Date: | 03/16/2010 |
| Citation: | Dolan-Heitlinger v. Nat'l Credit Union Admin., No. 09–10095–CIV, 2010 WL 989236 (S.D. Fla. March 16, 2010) |
| Court Type: | Federal District |
| Court: | Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) |
| Judge: | Federal Magistrate Judge: Andrea M. Simonton |
| Rule(s): | Rule 26(a) |
| Issues: | Plaintiff claimed a breach of employment contract and a breach of deferred compensation contract. Plaintiff filed multiple motions to compel, seeking documents and better answers to its interrogatories. |
| Resolution: | Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Comply with sections of the State Court’s Order, and Motion to Compel Defendant to Provide a Better Answer to Interrogatories granted in part. |
| Relevant Documents: |
Response in Opposition to Motion to Compel (Doc. 24) |
| E-Discovery Issues: | Motion to Compel |
| E-discovery Tags: | Costs, Privilege, Work Product |
Deprecated: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /h/cnswww-ediscovery.law/ediscovery.law.ufl.edu/htdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5516