Horowitch v. Diamond Aircraft Indus., Inc.
Horowitch v. Diamond Aircraft Indus., Inc.
Case Date: | 04/23/2007 |
Citation: | Horowitch v. Diamond Aircraft Indus., Inc., No. 6:06-CV-1703-Orl-19JGG, 2007 WL 1192401 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 23, 2007) |
Court Type: | Federal District |
Court: | Middle District of Florida (M.D. Fla.) |
Judge: | Federal Magistrate Judge: James G. Glazebrook |
Rule(s): | Rule 26; Rule 33; Rule 34 |
Issues: | Plaintiff moved to compel documents and further answers to interrogatories. |
Resolution: | The Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff’s motion to compel. To the extent Defendant objected based on general assertions of privilege and vagueness/overbreadth, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to compel, as Defendant did not specifically object and create a privilege log. However, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to compel production of some documents, because Plaintiff did not make a good faith effort to communicate with opposing counsel and resolve the dispute beforehand. |
Relevant Documents: | Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 34) Exhibit B to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 34-3) Exhibit C to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 34-4) Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 44) |
E-Discovery Issues: | Motion to Compel |
E-discovery Tags: | Attorney-Client, Communication/Cooperation, Possession or Control, Privilege, Relevancy, Work Product |