In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litig.
In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litig.
| Case Date: | 11/01/2016 |
| Citation: | In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litig., Case No. 3:15–md–2626–J–20JRK, 2016 WL 6518660 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 1, 2016) |
| Court Type: | Federal District |
| Court: | Middle District of Florida (M.D. Fla.) |
| Judge: | Federal Magistrate Judge: James R. Klindt |
| Rule(s): | Rule 26 |
| Issues: | Class Plaintiffs moved to compel Defendant to provide discovery for eighteen additional custodians. Defendant claimed that additional discovery would impose an undue burden and was not proportional to the needs of the case. |
| Resolution: | The Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs’ motion to compel. The Court attempted to strike a balance between the need for additional relevant evidence, and the costs it would impose upon Defendant. Therefore, the Court allowed discovery for an additional 6 (six) custodians. |
| Relevant Documents: | Order on Motion to Compel to Include Additional Custodians (Doc. 349) Motion to Compel to Include Additional Custodians (Doc. 276) Declaration of Peggy Wedgeworth (Doc. 277) Response in Opposition of Motion to Compel to Include Additional Custodians (Doc. 286)
|
| E-Discovery Issues: | Motion to Compel |
| E-discovery Tags: | Custodian, Keyword Search, Proportionality, Vendor |
| E-discovery subjects: |