In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litig. » The Florida E-Discovery Case Law Database » Levin College of Law » University of Florida

In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litig.

In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litig.

Case Date: 11/01/2016
Citation: In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litig., Case No. 3:15–md–2626–J–20JRK, 2016 WL 6518660 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 1, 2016)
Court Type: Federal District
Court: Middle District of Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Judge: Federal Magistrate Judge: James R. Klindt
Rule(s): Rule 26
Issues:

Class Plaintiffs moved to compel Defendant to provide discovery for eighteen additional custodians. Defendant claimed that additional discovery would impose an undue burden and was not proportional to the needs of the case.

Resolution:

The Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs’ motion to compel. The Court attempted to strike a balance between the need for additional relevant evidence, and the costs it would impose upon Defendant. Therefore, the Court allowed discovery for an additional 6 (six) custodians.

Relevant Documents:

Order on Motion to Compel to Include Additional Custodians (Doc. 349) 

Motion to Compel to Include Additional Custodians (Doc. 276)

Declaration of Peggy Wedgeworth (Doc. 277) 

Response in Opposition of Motion to Compel to Include Additional Custodians (Doc. 286) 

 

E-Discovery Issues: Motion to Compel
E-discovery Tags: Custodian, Keyword Search, Proportionality, Vendor
E-discovery subjects: Email

Published: April 10th, 2018

Category: Uncategorized


Deprecated: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /h/cnswww-ediscovery.law/ediscovery.law.ufl.edu/htdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5516

Comments are closed.