Mohamed v. American Motor Co. » The Florida E-Discovery Case Law Database » Levin College of Law » University of Florida

Mohamed v. American Motor Co.

Mohamed v. American Motor Co.

Case Date: 09/28/2017
Citation: Mohamed v. Am. Motor Co., Case No. 15-23352-Civ-COOKE/TORRES, 2017 WL 4310757 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2017)
Court Type: Federal District
Court: Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Judge: Federal District Judge: Marcia G. Cooke
Rule(s): Fed. R. Evid. 702
Issues:

Defendant filed a motion to exclude Plaintiff’s expert report, alleging that Plaintiff’s expert was not qualified as an expert and used methodologies that were not reliable.

Resolution:

The Court granted Defendant’s motion to exclude. Although the Court determined that Plaintiff’s expert was sufficiently qualified to provide an expert opinion, the Court did not consider the Plaintiff’s expert’s analysis reliable enough to submit to the jury. Plaintiff’s expert did not actually test the specific platform at issue in the instant case.

Relevant Documents:

Motion to Exclude Expert Report Supplemental Report and Testimony (Doc. 160)

Response in Opposition to Motion to Exclude (Doc. 161) 

Reply in Support of Motion to Exclude (Doc. 169)

Order on Motion to Exclude (Doc. 301)

E-Discovery Issues: Motion to Exclude
E-discovery Tags: Forensic Analysis/Examination
E-discovery subjects: Cell phone, Phone records, Software, Text message

Published: February 1st, 2018

Category: Uncategorized


Deprecated: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /h/cnswww-ediscovery.law/ediscovery.law.ufl.edu/htdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5516

Comments are closed.