Procaps S.A. v. Patheon Inc. » The Florida E-Discovery Case Law Database » Levin College of Law » University of Florida

Procaps S.A. v. Patheon Inc.

Procaps S.A. v. Patheon Inc.

Case Date: 03/18/2014
Citation: Procaps S.A. v. Patheon Inc., No. 12–24356–CIV, 2014 WL 1047748 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 18, 2014)
Court Type: Federal District
Court: Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Judge: Federal Magistrate Judge: Jonathan Goodman
Rule(s): Rule 37
Issues:

Defendant filed Motion to Compel Plaintiff to propose adequate search terms.

Resolution:

Court ordered Plaintiff’s counsel to obtain appropriate search terms from its key ESI custodians. Costs awarded to defendant, because none of the Rule 37(a) exceptions applied and the law required an award of fees.

Relevant Documents:

Order Granting Motion for Forensic Analysis (Doc. 341) 

Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Propose Adequate Search Terms (Doc. 354)

Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Propose Adequate Search Terms (Doc. 355) 

Response in Opposition to Motion to Compel Adequate Search Terms (Doc. 370) 

Supplement to Response to Motion to Compel Adequate Search Terms (Doc. 372) 

Response to Supplement to Response Motion to Compel Adequate Search Terms (Doc. 386)

Order on Motion to Compel Adequate Search Terms (Doc. 404)

E-Discovery Issues: Litigation Hold, Motion to Compel
E-discovery Tags: Communication/Cooperation, Cost Shifting, Custodian, Forensic Analysis/Examination, Keyword Search, Preservation and Collection
E-discovery subjects: Computer, Email

Published: November 26th, 2017

Category: Uncategorized


Deprecated: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /h/cnswww-ediscovery.law/ediscovery.law.ufl.edu/htdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5411

Comments are closed.