Rosenbaum v. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. » The Florida E-Discovery Case Law Database » Levin College of Law » University of Florida

Rosenbaum v. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A.

Rosenbaum v. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A.

Case Date: 02/23/2010
Citation: Rosenbaum v. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., No. 08–CV–81004, 2010 WL 623699 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 23, 2010)
Court Type: Federal District
Court: Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Judge: Federal Magistrate Judge: Linnea R. Johnson
Rule(s): Rule 26
Issues:

The cause of action arose form a breach of employment and deferred compensation agreement under Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The Court had to decide on a number of issues involving relevancy, overbreadth, work product privilege, attorney-client privilege, and other confidentiality concerns in assessing the validity of the Motion to Compel and Motion for Protective Order before the Court.

Resolution:

Motions granted in part and denied in part. The Court ordered old firm to locate documents on its computer system using search terms and email addresses, and to produce them in hard copy or electronic form, whichever was least burdensome.

Relevant Documents:

Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 74)

Motion to Compel (Doc. 78)

Response in Opposition to Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 94)

Response in Opposition to Motion to Compel (Doc. 104)

Order (Doc. 161) 

 

E-Discovery Issues: Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Compel
E-discovery Tags: Data Backup, Data Recovery, Email, Keyword Search, Privilege, Proportionality, Trade Secrets
E-discovery subjects: Email

Published: November 26th, 2017

Category: Uncategorized


Deprecated: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /h/cnswww-ediscovery.law/ediscovery.law.ufl.edu/htdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5411

Comments are closed.