Seven Seas Cruises S. De R.L. v. V. Ships Leisure Sam
Seven Seas Cruises S. De R.L. v. V. Ships Leisure Sam
| Case Date: | 01/19/2011 |
| Citation: | Seven Seas Cruises S. De R.L. v. V. Ships Leisure Sam, No. 09–23411–CIV, 2011 WL 181439 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 19, 2011) |
| Court Type: | Federal District |
| Court: | Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) |
| Judge: | Federal Magistrate Judge: Andrea M. Simonton |
| Rule(s): | Rule 34 |
| Issues: | Plaintiff cruise ship owners and/or their agents brought action against Defendants for damages arising out of the alleged failure to provide proper ship maintenance. The issue was whether Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the discovery of electronic information was permissible, as Plaintiffs alleged Defendants did not conduct a proper search nor produce the information in the agreed upon format. |
| Resolution: | Motion denied in part. The parties’ dispute resulted from the failure to communicate and work together in good faith. The Court would not allow a renewed motion to compel until the parties attempted to resolve dispute without court intervention. |
| Relevant Documents: |
Response in Opposition to Motion to Compel (Doc. 166) Reply in Support of Motion to Compel (Doc. 183) Sur-Reply to Plaintiff’s Reply to Motion to Compel (Doc. 205) |
| E-Discovery Issues: | Motion to Compel |
| E-discovery Tags: | Bates Stamping, Boolean Search, Communication/Cooperation, Costs, Custodian, Keyword Search, Sources of ESI, TIFF Images, Vendor |
| E-discovery subjects: | Computer, Email, Software |
Deprecated: Theme without comments.php is deprecated since version 3.0.0 with no alternative available. Please include a comments.php template in your theme. in /h/cnswww-ediscovery.law/ediscovery.law.ufl.edu/htdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5516